Highway Expansion - Creating Tomorrows Problems Today


A Rail solution for the I-70 Mountain Corridor will not only be less
expensive than a highway expansion solution, but will better facilitate
the Context Sensitive Solutions process and provide for a superior
Context Sensitive Design.


Context Sensitive Design - I-70 Glenwood Canyon

Picture7.jpg


Picture5.jpg


Picture8.jpg


Picture9.jpg


Picture12.jpg

Context Sensitive Solutions

CSS


Picture6.jpg

 
CDOT Context Sensitive Solutions Memo


 Picture1.png


Picture2.png



Picture3.png

Picture4.png


“By partnering and collaborating on a multi-disciplinary basis with each
community, we will find ways to achieve our transportation objectives
while at the same time respecting local values.”



Picture10.jpg


“Our end result should exceed our expectations and those of community
members, and should achieve a level of excellence in people's minds”


Picture11.jpg


“The project is in harmony with the community and preserves
environmental, scenic, aesthetic, historic and natural resource
values of the area.”


Picture21.jpg

The Context Sensitive Solution process was not used by CDOT in the Tier 1
Draft PEIS which selects highway expansion as the priority action in the
mountain corridor.
 


dm1.png
 

The Draft PEIS process did not incorporate the Context Sensitive Solutions
process which requires that an interdisciplinary team of stakeholders be
created and have active input to decision making throughout the PEIS
process.  Instead, CDOT retained unilateral control of the Draft PEIS
decision making process, shutting down all corridor stakeholders
(the far left of the chart above and below).

 

input.png


Implementation of the Context Sensitive Solutions process at Tier 2 when the
mode and general alignment of the preferred alternative has already been
selected negates the benefits of the CSS process. The single most effective
Impact Mitigation tool is Avoidance of Impacts.

 

Avoidance is the selection of an improvement alternative that mitigates mobility,
economic, social, community, historic, cultural and environmental impacts by
selecting the Least Harmful Alternative.

 

Tier 2 Impact Mitigation is relatively Meaningless if the
Most Harmful Alternative is selected in Tier 1
(the current situation for the I-70 Draft PEIS).

 

The cost of highway improvements in the DPEIS is deceptively low because it
does not include CSS or specific mitigation measures to ensure environmentally
protective design.

 

If Glenwood Canyon’s four lanes were built today, it would cost around $80
million per mile in Capital Cost.  A six lane extrapolation for a
Glenwood Canyon
style design would result in capiatal costs exceeding $100 million per mile.


Six Lane Highway Costs w/Context Sensitive Design:

 

- MP 259 to 253, Westbound Only, Morrison/US 40 Interchange

   to Chief Hosa Interchange - $100 Million

 

- MP 247 to 225, Eastbound and Westbound, Floyd Hill to Silver

   Plume, 22 miles in Clear Creek County w/Context Sensitive

   Design- $2.2 billion

 

- MP 225 to 215, Eastbound and Westbound, Silver Plume to

   EJMT, 10 miles - $1 billion

 

- EJMT Third Bore - $450 million

 

- MP 180 to 190, Eastbound & Westbound, Vail Pass w/ Context

   Sensitive Design - $1 billion

 

- Dowd Canyon Tunnel - $364 million

 

Total  $5.114 billion


An Elevated Rail Solution from Golden to Vail has been estimated
at between $3.7 and $4 billion which would be less expensive than
a six lane highway solution.

The truth is that a rail solution will not only be less expensive than
a highway expansion solution for the I-70 mountain corridor, but will
better facilitate the Context Sensitive Solutions process and provide
for a superior Context Sensitive Design.