I-70 Six Lane Reconstruction

Fifteen Years of Highway Expansion Construction

(2010 to 2025)

traffic.png

 

Highway Expansion - Creating Tomorrows Transportation Problems Today

 

Six Lane Highway reconstruction as proposed by CDOT in the Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement, (48 miles total - in Clear Creek County, mp 247 to mp 213, in Eagle County, 190 to 180 and 173 to 169) including excavation and fill work and tunneling for relaxed curve geometry and 65 mph design speeds will be difficult and take many years to complete. 

All Highway expansion alternatives in the Draft PEIS are in the Greatest Construction Impact group; however CDOT does not suggest any alternate means of transportation through or around Corridor construction areas during the extended construction period.  It is assumed that Front Range motorists traveling to the mountains will continue to use I-70 as their primary route and tolerate increasing construction congestion and delays throughout the 15 year construction period.

FH2.jpg

 

Highway construction including special innovations to accommodate corridor community values, safety, environmental protection and the aesthetics that are so important to the people that live in and travel the Corridor, will need extensive engineering, design, planning and mitigation.  Weather, narrow canyons, huge rock faces, blasting, additional tunnel bores, and minimizing intrusion into watershed, rock fall and avalanche areas; minimizing disturbance of mill tailings and other heavily mineralized areas and minimizing intrusion(s) into private property, towns, parks and historic and landmark districts will all contribute to the length of the highway construction period.

 

The length of the productive construction season in the mountains is heavily influenced by weather, especially at higher elevations.   Snow storms, wind, freezing temperatures and frozen ground will delay construction progress in the winter months.  The Draft PEIS indicates that in the higher elevations of the corridor, between East Vail and Georgetown, winter construction would typically not be feasible.   It should be assumed that the bulk of the highway construction activity would be carried out during the traditional spring, summer and fall periods. 

 

Highway reconstruction including excavation and tunneling for 65 mph design speeds and the increased footprint for construction disturbance zones will make interference with Corridor traffic very likely.  It will be a significant challenge to maintain an adequate level of operation of the current I-70 highway during the highway expansion period. 

Picture12.jpg


Highway construction in the Mountain Corridor is different than it might be in Metro Denver or other places in the country, since there are in places no viable alternative routes, (no side streets and no frontage roads).  There is no alternative to I-70 or frontage roads between Bakerville and the Eisenhower Tunnel, between Silver Plume and Georgetown, between Fall River Road and either Idaho Springs or Dumont, between Hidden Valley and Kermitt's, (Exit 244) and between Genesee Park (Exit 254) and Evergreen Parkway (Exit 252).

The I-70 Mountain Corridor provides critical mobility for Corridor residents and in some places is not just the primary transportation link between communities, but the ONLY link.  Lengthy periods of highway construction congestion and delays will have a substantial impact on Corridor residents with potential degradation of access to businesses and schools, public services, law enforcement, social services, fire protection and ambulance services.

Picture13.jpg


During periods of active construction throughout the 15 year duration, Corridor residents will have difficulty getting their children to school, going to the grocery store or going to work in the Denver Metro area or other Corridor Counties.  Escaping highway congestion and delays will be difficult for both residents and visitors.  These delays could have a dramatic impact on the quality of life for Corridor residents and visitors during construction as well as affecting the economic sustainability of Corridor Communities including local businesses, assessed values and tax base.

Many Front Range residents moved to Colorado at least in part because of convenient access to the high country.  Diminished mountain access over a 15 year highway construction period could have quality of life impacts not just for Corridor residents, but for residents throughout the Front Range.

const.png

The Draft PEIS indicates that during the 15 year highway construction period, reductions in the number of lanes, and temporary total closures will occur during off peak travel periods to accommodate excavation, blasting, boring, rock scaling and the movement of equipment and materials.  During peak periods lane closures will be avoided, but are possible.  Lane and shoulder narrowings, transitions and detours from old pavement to new pavement with reduced standards and speeds, and shoulders barricaded from traffic in order to allow construction work to proceed at their edges should be expected.  The use of traffic control devices will be extensive and will affect the speed of traffic in construction areas.  Construction activity in close proximity of traffic will likely result in extended traffic interference.  All of these items will add to travel times over the 15 year highway construction period.

Picture3.png

 

CDOT assumes a best case scenario for highway expansion construction management and mobility.  Assuming a best case scenario is not necessarily good planning. 

 

CDOT has not publicly acknowledged the almost certain mobility restrictions, economic and community impacts that will occur during a 15 year highway expansion construction period.  Colorado’s general public needs to have a better understanding of these impacts and how the Front Range’s primary access to the mountains will be affected by I-70 highway expansion during a 15 year construction period. 

Picture7.png

 


How do we get from here:

Current Conditions

from Exit 244 (US6/Kermitt's) to Georgetown

 

1.png

 

and from here:

Current Conditions in

Idaho Springs, Lawson, Silver Plume

and Georgetown Hill

 

4.png

 

 

To here:
Six Lanes – No Mitigation

 

8.png

 

Or here:

Six Lanes with Context Sensitive Design
(Glenwood Canyon Style Design)

 

3.png

 

without enormous disturbance to highway travel during the 10 year plus construction period?

 


 

Wouldn't there be much less disturbance to highway travel for the construction of the Advanced Guideway System adjacent to the highway?

 

5.png

 

or the construction of Elevated Rail (EMU) adjacent to the highway?

 

6.png

 

To understand how building Elevated Rail or Advanced Guideway System first would not preclude highway expansion at a later date - click here

 


 

If Needed, once the Advanced Guideway System is built, Express Lanes can be added.

 

11.png

 

or

 

If Needed, once the European EMU System is built, Express Lanes can be added.

 

12.png